We Are Not Alternative: A Communal Take on Theorization and Canon in Anthropology Theory Courses - Part 1: Setting Out on a Theoretical Journey
By Elise Ferrer, Nada Bahgat, and Madison Shomaker
This piece is the first of four installments in the series “We are Not Alternative: A Communal Take on Theorization and Canon in Anthropological Theory Courses.” This series explores the rethinking and challenging of traditional anthropological canon that we experienced in our Fall 2022 graduate course The Craft of Anthropology II at American University in Washington, D.C.
“Where do you know from?” [1]
This seemingly simple question, posited by our professor Thurka Sangaramoorthy to the incoming graduate cohort of Public Anthropology students at American University in the fall of 2022, was discussed every week for the semester. It also becomes the fundamental consideration for the authors of this series. As a foundational social theory course required for the degree, this course section of the Craft of Anthropology utilized a modified version of the Reworking the History of Social Theory for 21st Century Anthropology syllabus.
The syllabus—just like Sangaramoorthy’s prompt—established a quest for redefining theory. The syllabus and class were a journey of questioning the theory we know, thinking of the theory we need and wish for, and interrogating the limitations within the anthropological canon to produce it. During that journey, our class traversed a winding road of emotions each week while sitting with theory, and attempting to see, feel, and reckon with it. By engaging with this course and syllabus, our classroom and readings became a cognitive and emotional space that expanded and challenged who and what we imagine as our intellectual lineage. It questioned and destabilized broader epistemological, pedagogical, and ontological norms experienced and felt within the discipline and within our own minds.
“Where do you know from?” The question was an invitation to attend to the diverse forms of one’s engagement with others. The process required grappling, sitting, and pondering. As much as it was rethinking our own identities through tracing our processes of knowledge, interaction, and production, it was an illuminating experience of the different scales of knowledge we had not intensively contemplated before. Unpacking the question within our stories was a way to reveal the unconventional ways of experiencing theory, through being, feeling, and relating.
The scholars studied in this course are, and have always been, the anthropological canon whether or not they have been merited as such. They are not alternative scholars, this is not an alternative syllabus, and we are not alternative students. In the fall semester of 2022, our cohort of 7 female and gender-nonconforming individuals experienced theory through art, practice, and feelings. We experienced feelings as theory as we engaged with the possibilities and material praxis of learning from a decolonized, anti-racist, and unsettled anthropological canon. In reading this series, we hope you consider, as a researcher, student, professor, scholar, or activist: where do you know from?
References
[1] Eugenia Zuroski, “’Where Do You Know From’: An Exercise in Placing Ourselves Together in the Classroom,” Mai Feminism, January 27, 2020, https://maifeminism.com/where-do-you-know-from-an-exercise-in-placing-ourselves-together-in-the-classroom/
American University. n.d. “Master of Arts in Public Anthropology” Accessed May 12, 2023. https://www.american.edu/cas/anthropology/ma/
Benton, A. 2017. Reading the classics. Ideology, tautology, and memory. Ethnographic Emergency (blog).
Chua, Liana, and Nayanika Mathur. 2018. “Introduction.: WHO ARE ‘WE’?” In Who Are “We”?: Reimagining Alterity and Affinity in Anthropology, edited by Liana Chua and Nayanika Mathur, 1st ed., 34:1–34. Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw049n2.5.
Combahee River Collective. 1983. Combahee River Collective Statement. In B. Smith (Ed.), Home Girls: A Black Feminist Anthology (pp 264-274). New York: Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press.
Buell et al. 2018. “Decanonizing Anthropology: Reworking the History of Social Theory for 21st Century Anthropology: A Syllabus Project” Footnotes (blog). https://footnotesblogcom.wordpress.com/2019/02/15/decanonizing-anthropology/
Deloria, E. C. (1944). Speaking of Indians. New York: Friendship Press.
DuBois, W.E.B. (1903). The Souls of Black Folk.
Eastman, C. A. (Ed.), Red Hunters and the Animal People (pp. 177-199). New York: Harper & Brothers.
Fanon, F. 2003. Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press. (Originally published in 1963).
Fei, H. (1939) Peasant Life in China: A Field Study of Country Life in the Yangtze Valley. New York: E.P. Dutton.
Firmin, A. (2000). The Equality of Human Races (Positivist Anthropology). Translated by Asselin Charles. Introduction by Carolyn Fluehr-Lobban. New York: Garland Publishing.
Gattey, Emma. n.d. “Makereti : Māori ‘Insider’ Anthropology at Oxford” Oxford and Empire Network. Accessed May 12, 2023. https://oxfordandempire.web.ox.ac.uk/article/makereti
Hurston, Z. N. 2018. Barracoon: The Story of the Last “Black Cargo.” New York: Amistad.
Jenks, Angela. Twitter Post. July 16, 2019, 2:58 pm. https://twitter.com/angelacjenks/status/1151204579389792256
Lutz, Catherine. 1995. The Gender of Theory. Ruth Behar and Deborah Gordon, eds., Women Writing Culture/Culture Writing Women, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2323826
“The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House.” 1984. In Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches, by Audre Lorde, Revised, 110–13. The Crossing Press Feminist Series. Berkeley, Calif: Crossing Press, c2007.
“MA in Public Anthropology | American University, Washington, DC.” n.d. Accessed May 14, 2023. https://www.american.edu/cas/anthropology/ma/.
Makereti (Sometimes Chieftainess of the Arawa Tribe, Known in New Zealand as Maggie Papakura). 1938. The Old-Time Māori. London: Victor Gollancz.
Nine Network. 2007. KETC | Living St. Louis | Katherine Dunham. (YouTube video,25:56).
Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). 1978. Katherine Dunham. Arlington, VA: Macneil-Lehrer Productions. (Video).
Simpson, Audra. 2007. “On Ethnographic Refusal: Indigeneity, ‘Voice’ and Colonial Citizenship.” Junctures, 9
Simpson, Audra. 2014. “Constructing Kahanawà:ke as an ‘Out of the Way’ Place: Ely S. Parker, Lewis Henry Morgan, and the Writing of the Iroquois Confederacy.” in Mohawk Interruptus: Political Life Across the Borders of Settler States (pp.67-94). Durham: Duke University Press.
Ulysse, G. A. 2017. Why Rasanblaj, Why Now?: New Salutations to the Four Cardinal Points in Haitian Studies. Journal of Haitian Studies 23 (2): 58-80.
Ulysse, G. A. 2018. How do you overturn history in 400 years? In G. A. Ulysse (Ed.) Because When God Is Too Busy: Haïti, me and THE WORLD (pp. 66-71). Middletown, CT: Wesleyan Univ Press.
Ulysse, G.A. 2019. “Homage to Those Who Hollered before Me/Meditations on Inheritances and Lineages, Anthropological and Otherwise.” Anthropology News, April 8, 2019.
Walker, Alice. 2018. Foreward to Barracoon: The Story of the Last “Black Cargo.” New York: Amistad.
Watkins, Rachel. 2019. An Alter(ed)native Perspective on Historical Bioarchaeology. Historical archaeology. 53. 10.1007/s41636-019-00224-5.
Yale University, “An Anthropology of Abolition / Liberation with Aimee M. Cox and Panelists,” YouTube Video, 1:28:50, April 6, 2022, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-BTMpj9KYI.
Cite As
Elise Ferrer, Nada Bahgat, and Madison Shomaker. 2024. “We Are Not Alternative: A Communal Take on Theorization and Canon in Anthropology Theory Courses.” American Anthropologist website, Feb 13.